Iowa Woman Proves Gender Discrimination Based on Sex Stereotypes

Earlier this year, Walmart, one of the nation’s largest private employers, agreed to pay a former female employee working in Ottumwa, Iowa, $60,000 and to provide training regarding sex discrimination to managers. The EEOC, on behalf of the employee, sued Walmart when the female employee had been passed over for a promotion to manager because store management assumed that, because the employee had young children at home, she was not interested in advancing her career.

In a press release, the EEOC stated, “Sex discrimination includes discrimination against an employee because of sex-based stereotypes, such as the stereotype that mothers are unreliable or uncommitted employees.” Judge Stephanie Rose, Chief Judge of the Southern District of Iowa, had previously refused to dismiss the case stating, “The ‘pervasive presumption that women are mothers first, and workers second’ is among the sex stereotypes Congress has explicitly identified as impermissible.” (citing to prior US Supreme Court decision).

While women are increasingly entering the workforce, they often face barriers to advancement in their careers. One of those barriers is known as the “Motherhood Penalty.” Studies have shown that mothers earn about 5% less per child than others performing the same work. Fathers do not face this same wage disparity. In fact, all women of childbearing age are penalized at work because of the assumption that they will have children. These barriers are a result of gender stereotypes only, as there is no evidence suggesting that mothers do not perform equally to others at work. Overcoming and eliminating the “Motherhood Penalty” should be a priority for all employers.

At Ann Brown Legal we represent women who have been discriminated against at work because of their gender. This includes women who have been discriminated against based on stereotypes about employees who are mothers. If you believe that you have been a victim of workplace discrimination, please call us to discuss your concerns at (319) 866-9277.

Iowa's Women Coaches Are the Best in the Country. They Deserve Equal Pay for Equal Work

The Iowa Women’s basketball team has the entire country captivated with their talent, grit and skillful play. What could possibly be disappointing about this season? Only one thing. The coaching staff—the masterminds behind it all—are grossly underpaid compared to the coaching staff for the men’s basketball team.

Lisa Bluder’s contract provides for a guaranteed $1.4 million annually, while Fran McCaffrey, the men’s coach, is guaranteed $3.3 million a year. Jan Jensen, the associate head women’s coach who, by all accounts, is one of the best assistant coaches in the country, earns $255,000 annually and assistant coach Raina Harmon earns $165,000. Meanwhile, men’s assistant coach Sherman Dillard earns $298,619 annually, Matt Gatens earns $277,500 and Courtney Eldridge earns $267,200. U of I salaries.

Lisa Bluder has been at the University of Iowa for 24 years and has gotten her team into the NCAA tournament an astonishing 17 times! She is a three-time Big Ten coach of the year, a Naismith Award winner and has coached the Hawkeyes to back-to-back Final Fours.

The gender pay gap is widespread across the entire workforce, but it is highlighted in the continuing disparities between male and female coaches. This pay discrimination has been challenged in court on multiple occasions. In 1994, Marianne Stanley, the women’s basketball coach at USC, sued the college under the Equal Pay Act because she was paid substantially less than the coach of the men’s team despite the success of her program. At the time, the court concluded she did not perform equal work to the men’s coach, because men’s basketball was simply more popular and, therefore, the men’s coach had more responsibilities. Ignoring the fact that I completely disagree with the court’s reasoning, that certainly can’t justify the pay difference for the coaching staff at Iowa now. The Iowa women sold far more tickets this year than the men’s team and for a higher average price. Women’s basketball on Fox is averaging more viewers than men’s basketball, and it’s reasonable to assume that holds true for other networks.

But times are changing. Even if it is at a glacial pace. In 2017, Jane Meyer, a senior associate athletic director sued the University of Iowa alleging gender discrimination within the athletics department, including that she was paid less than a male athletic director with the same job. A jury agreed with Meyer and awarded her $1.43 million in damages.

Women in the US still earn about 83 cents for every dollar earned by men for performing EQUAL WORK. The pay gap for black women is even worse at 70 cents on the dollar. This is 61 years after the enactment of the Equal Pay Act. Equal pay is important for all women, not just coaches. The gender pay gap persists among women of all educational and achievement levels.

The University of Iowa, with the national audience they now enjoy because of women’s basketball, should be a leader in closing the gender pay gap. Other universities have done just that. Kim Mulkey at LSU earns $3.26 million per year compared to the men’s basketball coach who earns $2.7 million. South Carolina Coach Dawn Mulkey earns $3.1 million annually, which is much closer to the $3.7 million paid annually to the men’s coach.

It is well past time for men’s and women’s basketball coaches to be paid equally. Not just the head coaches, but the assistants too. They are doing Equal Work. They deserve Equal Pay.

Wrongful Death Cases: Why women's lives should be valued equally with men's

Iowa Wrongful Death Attorney

Throughout my career, I've represented families who have lost a loved one because of the negligence of another. Whether the result of a car accident, medical malpractice or even criminal conduct, wrongful death cases are important not just to the family involved, but also as a way to make the world safer and hopefully spare another family a similar tragedy.

I've helped families where the victim was male; I've helped families where the victim was female. One disturbing truth that I've discovered is that many insurance companies—even lawyers—will place a lower value on the life of a loved one if the person lost is a woman. 

Insurance companies and defense attorneys make arguments about women's earnings and their role supporting their families, but the truth is that this belief about women's lives is archaic, insulting and ridiculous. I have refused to ever accept this logic when representing families. Children who have lost their mother, husbands who have lost their wives, parents who have lost a daughter—their tragedy should never be devalued because of outdated and simple minded arguments. All lawyers representing families who have lost a female family member should advocate for that family as strenuously as any other family and recognize and honor their loss by rejecting all claims that women's lives are somehow worth less than men's lives. 

What is a cynic? A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.
— Oscar Wilde