Iowa Woman Proves Gender Discrimination Based on Sex Stereotypes

Earlier this year, Walmart, one of the nation’s largest private employers, agreed to pay a former female employee working in Ottumwa, Iowa, $60,000 and to provide training regarding sex discrimination to managers. The EEOC, on behalf of the employee, sued Walmart when the female employee had been passed over for a promotion to manager because store management assumed that, because the employee had young children at home, she was not interested in advancing her career.

In a press release, the EEOC stated, “Sex discrimination includes discrimination against an employee because of sex-based stereotypes, such as the stereotype that mothers are unreliable or uncommitted employees.” Judge Stephanie Rose, Chief Judge of the Southern District of Iowa, had previously refused to dismiss the case stating, “The ‘pervasive presumption that women are mothers first, and workers second’ is among the sex stereotypes Congress has explicitly identified as impermissible.” (citing to prior US Supreme Court decision).

While women are increasingly entering the workforce, they often face barriers to advancement in their careers. One of those barriers is known as the “Motherhood Penalty.” Studies have shown that mothers earn about 5% less per child than others performing the same work. Fathers do not face this same wage disparity. In fact, all women of childbearing age are penalized at work because of the assumption that they will have children. These barriers are a result of gender stereotypes only, as there is no evidence suggesting that mothers do not perform equally to others at work. Overcoming and eliminating the “Motherhood Penalty” should be a priority for all employers.

At Ann Brown Legal we represent women who have been discriminated against at work because of their gender. This includes women who have been discriminated against based on stereotypes about employees who are mothers. If you believe that you have been a victim of workplace discrimination, please call us to discuss your concerns at (319) 866-9277.

Understanding the Individual Impact of Sexual Harassment

We write often on this blog about our beliefs as a law firm about believing and supporting individuals who have experienced sexual harassment. Sexual harassment can impact much more than your work environment and making the decision to take action against it can be difficult. It may be helpful to consider the ways in which those who experience sexual harassment are affected. If someone you love is being harassed, it could be easier to support them when you understand what they’re going through. Or maybe you’re interested in learning about why movements like the #MeToo Movement are gaining momentum and relevance in Iowa, and in the country as a whole. While sexual harassment is a product of a greater social issue, the effects of sexual harassment in terms of the individual can be profound.

If someone is being sexually harassed, it will often affect their performance and environment in the workplace. Sexual harassment can create an extremely negative work environment. The individual may find themselves feeling angry, embarrassed or scared while working. This can lead to avoiding shifts at work or taking PTO to avoid the harassment. It could have a negative effect on furthering education or advocating for a raise or a promotion, as those being harassed are less likely to feel comfortable and safe advocating for themselves. Many individuals will consider quitting work, which can cause further emotional and financial strain. 

Sexual harassment often affects individuals outside of the office as well. In their personal life, identifying and addressing sexual harassment can cause a lot of stress. This can have negative effects on both physical and mental health.  It can cause mental health problems like anxiety, depression, or even PTSD. It can also exacerbate previously existing issues like substance abuse. This stress can also manifest physically in the body, with symptoms like headaches, sore muscles, or issues with sleeping and fatigue. It’s important to keep in mind that the effects can last even after the sexual harassment has ended and can cause strain and conflict on interpersonal relationships. 

Sexual harassment is a complex issue that can take many forms and it can be easy to feel isolated. It’s important to remember that if you or someone you love is experiencing sexual harassment, you are not alone. There are resources to help. If you’re unsure whether you’re being treated fairly at work, you can read our blog post here. If you’re interested in learning about the current state and impact of sexual harassment in the U.S., you can check out the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. You can also find more resources on RAINN and the National Sexual Assault Hotline

If you have questions about your case or need a sexual harassment lawyer, please call us at (319) 826-2250 for a free initial consultation. 

The above information is meant to be helpful, but is not meant to replace the legal advice of an attorney with whom you have an attorney-client relationship.

Why is the Time’s Up Movement Relevant to Iowans?

TIME’S UP! We’re not talking about the microwave beeping that your burrito is ready or the proctor’s script for the ACT. We’re talking about a movement against sexual harassment and assault in the workplace. While this movement was originally started by women in the entertainment industry, their advocacy has expanded to include women in all careers across the country… including here in Iowa. 

Read more

Iowa Supreme Court Clears Up Standards for Employment Discrimination Under Iowa Civil Rights Act

Employment Discrimination Lawyer

On June 9, 2019, the Iowa Supreme Court issued an anticipated ruling in the case of Hawkins v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center. For you legal junkies, you can read the opinion here. Gregory Hawkins, who was represented by my friend and fierce advocate for employees, Brooke Timmer, sued his former employer, Grinnell Regional Medical Center, after he was fired following years of dedicated service. Hawkins claimed he was a victim of disability discrimination and retaliation and a jury agreed, awarding Hawkins over $4 million in damages.

Many issues were presented on appeal, but the Iowa Supreme Court focused on just two. Unfortunately, the Court overturned the verdict and sent the case back for a new trial because of certain evidence that was admitted at trial. But in addition to that, the Court addressed the standards of proof that apply in most cases of employment discrimination.

The Court confirmed its long standing, but often challenged, holding that an employee can prove an employer violated the Iowa Civil Rights Act by showing that a discriminatory or retaliatory motive was a motivating factor or played a part in the employer’s action taken against the employee. Discrimination does not need to be the only reason for the employer’s action for it to violate the ICRA, it just needs to be one of the reasons. This reasoning has always made perfect sense to me because I think it is pretty clear that the legislature intended to prohibit racism, sexism, retaliation, etc. in its entirety and did not intend to allow employers to be just a little racist or a little sexist.

The Court also eliminated the application of the federal rules for proving that an employer discriminated against an employee, which were often confusing for juries . . . and judges and attorneys. Finally, the Court announced that employers are entitled to a “same decision” defense. This means that if an employee proves that discrimination or retaliation was a motivating factor or played a part in the employer’s decision, the employer is liable under the ICRA unless the employer proves that it would have made the same decision even without the discriminatory or retaliatory motive.

As an employment discrimination lawyer, I am looking forward to advocating for my clients under these clearer standards.

UBER Sexual Harassment Allegations are a Wake-Up Call for the Tech Industry

The assertion by a former Uber employee that she was sexually harassed by her supervisor and then ignored by the human resources department has brought much-needed attention to a continuing problem in the tech industry - sexual harassment and sexual discrimination.

sexual harassment attorney 

On February 19, Susan Fowler, a former engineer at Uber published a blog recounting her experience at Uber, including being sexually propositioned by her boss. While this is certainly a disturbing set  of facts, perhaps more troubling is Ms. Fowler's description of what happened when she took her complaint to the human resources department. Ms. Fowler was advised that, while she clearly had been the victim of sexual harassment, her boss would only be given a warning despite multiple complaints from different women, because he was "a high performer." She was also advised that she (and not the harasser) could change jobs or alternatively that she would need to learn to deal with the harassment and the likelihood that she would be retaliated against for complaining.  

Ms. Fowler's now widely read post has resulted in numerous women working in the tech community sharing their own similar experiences. The LA Times reported that a 2015 survey had found that 60% of women in the tech industry have experienced unwanted sexual advances from a colleague and that a 2008 study found that 50% of women working in the tech industry will leave an employer at some point in their career because of a hostile work environment. 

Many tech companies hold themselves out to be very employee focused and so it is particularly disappointing that sexual harassment and sexual discrimination are pervasive among tech-based employers. Equally as disappointing is the practice of human resources departments turning a blind eye to complaints about employees if they are high performing. 

Ms. Fowler's blog has raised awareness at Uber, including prompting an independent investigation that will be conducted by former US Attorney General Eric Holder. Ms. Fowler's story also highlights why so many victims of sexual harassment remain silent. While sexual harassment is clearly illegal, some HR departments punish the victim instead of the perpetrator.

It is important for women to know that Title VII and most state civil rights acts, including the Iowa Civil Rights Act, prohibit conduct like Uber's. Complaints of sexual harassment must be adequately investigated when reported and retaliation against an employee who makes a complaint is explicitly prohibited.  Women who are being sexually harassed or who have suffered retaliation as a result of making a complaint about sexual harassment and are concerned about making a complaint should contact an employment lawyer to discuss their options. 

Equal Pay for Equal Work - What Every Working Woman Needs to Know

Women employee's contribution to the workplace is "immeasurable" as Forbes recently reported. "Women learn to do more with less, they are resourceful, and develop a unique political awareness." Despite the significant value that women workers bring to the workforce, in 2015 the AAUW reported that women were still only making 80% of what their male co-workers were making for the same job! At the current rate of improvement, women are not expected to reach pay equity until 2059. My daughter will be nearing retirement age by then!  The gender pay gap raises great concern among working women, but there are a few key things that as an employment lawyer, I believe every working woman should know. 

  1. Equal pay for equal work is the law. The federal Equal Pay Act, Title VII and Iowa's Equal Pay Act require that employers pay men and women equally if they perform substantially similar work. The work does not have to be identical and it does not matter if the employees have different job titles as long as the work is substantially similar. 

  2. All claims for discriminatory pay have a time limit to file a claim. The Iowa Equal Pay Act and Title VII require employees to file a complaint with the EEOC or Iowa Civil Rights Commission within 300 days of receiving the last discriminatory paycheck. The Equal Pay Act has a 2 or 3 year statute of limitations and does not require a filing with the EEOC, but has limits on the amount of damages recoverable. If you think you may have a claim and are concerned about these time limits, you should speak with an employment lawyer. 

  3. It's against the law for your employer to fire you for making a claim of discriminatory pay. Title VII, The Iowa Civil Rights Act and the EPA all prohibit retaliation by an employer for making a complaint of discrimination. Retaliation includes not only firing but other actions by an employer that negatively impact your employment. 

  4. Executives and women in leadership roles are more likely to be paid less than men in the same roles. You may assume that because you have advanced to a leadership role in your organization that you are not being paid unfairly, but the opposite is true. The Harvard Business Review reported that the pay gap widens for executive women, women with children and women with advanced degrees. 

  5. You can help close the pay gap for yourself and others. I believe that the most effective way for women to address the gender pay gap is to do everything in their power to make sure they are being paid equally as their male co-workers. If you know that you are not being paid fairly or suspect that is true you should raise the issue with your employer. If you continue to be paid unfairly or have left an employer where you were paid unfairly, you should talk with a lawyer and consider bringing a claim against your employer. Equal pay claims have different legal standards from other types of discrimination that can make it easier to prove claims based on unequal pay. 

Women employees know they are just as valuable to their employers as their male co-workers. They deserve to be paid the same. It is not only what is fair, but it is the law. 

Imagine you’re a little girl. You’re growing up. You practice as hard as you can, with girls, with boys. You have a dream. You fight, you work, you sacrifice to get to this stage. You work as hard as anyone you know. And then you get to this stage, and you’re told you’re not the same as a boy. Almost as good, but not quite the same. Think how devastating and demoralizing that could be.
— Venus Williams

The information on this page is intended to be helpful but should not replace formal legal advice. If you would like to speak with an Iowa employment lawyer about a potential claim for discriminatory pay, please call us at (319) 826-2250.